Legislation Details

File #: 25-5186    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Investment Memo Status: Passed
File created: 8/13/2025 In control: Commissioners Court
On agenda: 8/26/2025 Final action: 8/26/2025
Title: Request for approval of a Final Investment Memo for the Security Infrastructure Installation and Upgrades Project for an incremental amount of $2,473,260 for a total authorization of $2,493,260 for FY 2026 and commercial paper funding in the amount of $800,000.

 Primary Department: Universal Services

Primary Department Head/Elected Official: Sindhu Menon, Executive Director and CIO

Managing Department: Universal Services

Managing Department Head/Elected Official: Sindhu Menon, Executive Director and CIO

Regular or Supplemental RCA: Regular RCA

Type of Request: Investment Memo

Investment Memo Type: Final Investment Memo

 

Project Name: Security Infrastructure Enhancement Replacements

Project ID (if applicable): NI022

Vendor Legal Name (if applicable): N/A

 

MWBE Contracted Goal (if applicable): N/A

MWBE Current Achievement (if applicable): N/A

Justification for 0% MWDBE Participation Goal: N/A - Goal not applicable to request

 

Grant Indirect Costs Rate: N/A

Justification for 0% Grant Indirect Costs Rate (if applicable): N/A - Not a grant item

 

Incremental Authorization Requested: $2,473,260

Total Estimated Project Cost: $5,060,000 (FY26 & FY27)

 

Request Summary:

title

Request for approval of a Final Investment Memo for the Security Infrastructure Installation and Upgrades Project for an incremental amount of $2,473,260 for a total authorization of $2,493,260 for FY 2026 and commercial paper funding in the amount of $800,000.

end

 

Project Description:

This project refreshes physical security technology infrastructure, like video cameras and access control systems. Some of the current systems have exceeded their shelf life and/or are no longer supported. These systems will be retrofitted with the latest available technology to enhance security needs. Software enhancements and analytics are critical areas of focus in modern technological advancements. Software enhancements encompass the iterative improvements and updates made to existing software applications, aiming to enhance functionality, performance, security, and user experience. These enhancements often involve refining algorithms, optimizing code, and incorporating new features based on user feedback and technological advancements. The updated system will help to provide real-time feeds and alerts from multiple data sources to stay ahead of threats with intuitive workflows and data integrations to facilitate comprehensive intelligence collection and analysis-delivering automated, smart, and actionable insights to help make informed decisions.

 

Project Scope:

The security technology infrastructure upgrade project is divided into multiple phases. Each of the phases aims to update security infrastructure for Harris County buildings.  The security software and infrastructure update include network video recorders, access control systems, building intrusion systems, cameras, and duress alarms. US has previously completed phases; and will be moving into a new phase during FY26 which includes software/hardware upgrades and additions (please see the breakdown in the project expenditure table below) and installation for the following locations:

 

1.                     1910 Court House

2.                     Administration Building

3.                     Annex 21

4.                     Annex 44

5.                     Annex 46

6.                     Annex 7

7.                     Fire Marshall Office

8.                     Tomball Tax office

9.                     Family Law

10.                     Annex 12 (CAC)

11.                     Civil Court House

12.                     JJC

13.                     Radio Shop

14.                     Annex 18

15.                     IFS

16.                     Annex 35

17.                     Annex 18

18.                     Radio

19.                     Harris County Facilities that currently operate with outdated security technology infrastructure, which may be prone to device failures, projected for FY26.

 

Fisk will provide the necessary network cables and switches that’s needed for all the hardware that require connection to the Harris County data center. 

 

There might be changes in the County’s needs that result in minor operational changes for the project throughout the Fiscal Year, but the overall scope will remain the same, and any additional authorization would go through Commissioners Court approval.

 

Justification:

The replacement of these end-of-life security systems and hardware devices will help first responders in an emergency. The County's access system must comply with the Fire Code. In the event of an emergency, facility egress doors must be released to allow individuals to leave the premises. The system also supports duress buttons in the event of an emergency. Updating this technology will reduce the time spent by the Harris County agencies and provide efficiency in their work. These system upgrades will reduce the failure rate, which will help reduce operational repair costs. Each failure can cost $125 per hour to repair; reducing the work orders generated by the failure of these devices will reduce overall repair costs. Hiring a project manager is essential to ensure successful project delivery by providing centralized coordination, managing risks, and keeping projects on time and within budget. A project manager will streamline communication among stakeholders, allocate resources effectively, and mitigate potential delays or scope creep. Additionally, they will maintain quality control, ensuring that all deliverables meet specifications. By having a dedicated project manager, we can improve efficiency, reduce risks, and enhance overall project outcomes, ultimately leading to greater organizational success.

 

In addition, keeping security infrastructure up to date will not only help prevent facility theft from HC facilities but also promote safety for facility users, including employee and citizens. 

Anticipated Project Expenditures and Timeline:

Project Scope Breakdown

Estimated Cost

Estimated Completion

Multidirectional cameras

$650,000

9/2026

Door motor kits

$165,000

9/2026

Panic/Duress alerting devices

$25,000

9/2026

Misc. material hardware, cabling, strikes, Metal Detectors

$175,000

9/2026

Approx 6 network video recorders

$200,000

9/2026

Professional services - installation

$375,000

9/2026

Fisk cabling hardware cost

$290,000

9/2026

System Servers and database

$163,260

9/2026

Project Manager Contractor

$200,000

12/2026

Contingency

$250,000

 

FY26 Total Authorization

$2,493,260

 

Unencumbered existing project balance to carry into FY26

($20,000)

 

Total

$2,473,260

 

 

Justification & Alternatives:

Failure to maintain security infrastructure will prevent critical security updates and lead to security compromise and loss of compliance. Lack of equipment modernization will limit the County’s ability to secure facilities, property, staff, and citizens

 

Anticipated Impact on Other Funds (If Applicable):

Fund Code

Description

Estimated Cost

Funding Method  (Existing or Future Budget Request Required)

Estimated Date of Needs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

County Strategic Plan Goal:  1. Make Harris County safer and more just.

County Strategic Plan Objective: A: Reduce violent crime across the County.

Justice/Safety Initiative (Goal 1):   A2: Apply “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” principles to improve built environments of neighborhoods and increase safety.

Infrastructure Initiative (Goal 2):  Choose an item.

Economy Initiative (Goal 3): Choose an item.

Health Initiative (Goal 4): Choose an item.

Climate/Resilience Initiative (Goal 5): Choose an item.

Housing Initiative (Goal 6): Choose an item.


Decision Analysis Matrix Score (rubric on last page): 15

Previous Court Action:

Date

Agenda Item #

Action Taken

3/14/2017

2.e.3

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $1,065,000

1/9/2018

6.a.2

Request for approval of funding in the amount of $2,625,000

1/30/2018

4.f.1

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $2,625,000

5/14/2019

6.a

Request for approval of funding in the amount of $7,410,000

6/4/2019

4.e.2

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $7,410,000

5/19/2020

4.f.7

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $600,000

8/11/2020

4.c.2

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $700,000

9/15/2020

4.e.2

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $1,590,000

5/25/2021

21-2283

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $2,085,000

3/22/2022

22-2027

Request for an additional incremental authorization of $2,090,000 for a total SFY22 authorization of $2,890,000 and commercial paper funding $1,000,000

6/14/2022

22-3515

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $1,090,000

9/13/2022

22-5420

Request for an additional incremental authorization of $2,850,000, FY23 total authorization of $3,407,127

10/18/2022

22-6596

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $500,000 

4/4/2023

23-1972

Request for approval of commercial paper funding for $1,175,000

7/18/2023

23-3945

Request for approval of commercial paper funding $1,175,000

8/29/2023

23-4824

Request for an additional incremental authorization of $1,903,000 for FY24

10/10/2023

23-5837

Request for approval of commercial paper funding $1,500,000 for a total of $22,515,000

12/5/2023

23-7152

Request for approval of decrease commercial paper funding $1,000,000 for a net CP funding $21,515,000

2/27/2024

24-1115

Request for approval of commercial paper funding $1,405,000

 

Address: Multiple

Precinct(s): Countywide

Fiscal and Personnel Summary

 

 

 

 

Current Fiscal Year Cost

Annual Fiscal Cost

 

Labor

Non-Labor

Total

Recurring Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Funding Sources

 

Existing Budget

 

 

 

 

Choose an item.

$

$

$

$

Choose an item.

$

$

$

$

Choose an item.

$

$

$

$

Total Current Budget

$

$

$

$

Additional Budget Request

 

Commercial Paper

$

$800,000

$800,000

$

Choose an item.

$

$

$

$

Choose an item.

$

$

$

$

Total Additional Budget Request

$

$800,000

$800,000

$

Total Funding Request

$

$800,000

$800,000

$

Personnel (Fill out section only if requesting new PCNs)

 

Current Position Count for Service

-

-

-

-

Additional Positions Request

-

-

-

-

Total Personnel

-

-

-

-

 

Anticipated Court Date: 8/26/2025

Anticipated Implementation Date (if different from Court date): 10/1/2025

Emergency/Disaster Recovery Note: Not an emergency, disaster, or ARPA related item

Legal funding compliance confirmed by: Paige Abernathy, Special Assistant County Attorney, 7/22/2025

Department Approval by: Heather Merkel, Director of Budget, Universal Services 8/8/2025

OMB CIP Team Approval by: William McGuinness, Director-Capital Projects & Infrastructure, 8/7/2025

________________________________________

Commercial Paper Request (For OMB use only):

Receiving Department:      Universal Services

Project PeopleSoft ID: NI022

CP Series Description: Commercial Paper Series D can be used for (1) construction of public works, (2) the purchase of automobiles, equipment and machinery, including computers, materials and supplies for the operation of the County’s precincts and departments (3) Professional services, including services provided by engineers, architects, attorneys, auditors, financial advisors, and fiscal agents, in connection with the contractual obligations described in (1) and (2).

Commercial Paper is being requested for the Security Infrastructure Installation and Upgrades project and is expected to be repaid within the next three fiscal years either through bonds, budgetary means or pay-as-you-go sources.

OMB Financial Management contact: Amy Perez, Deputy Executive Director, Office of Management and Budget

 

 

Decision Analysis Matrix scoring tool - Commissioners Court has approved the rubric below for scoring capital projects. Please complete the last two rows for OMB review.

Scoring option

Strategic Plan alignment (3x weighting)

Evidence base

Impact on outcomes

Cost effectiveness

Ease of implementation

Collaboration / partnerships

Environmental sustainability

Equity

Total

-1

Antithetical to one or more aspects of the Strategic Plan

Evidence shows net negative impact on the intended goal

Impact is clearly negative

Costs expected (or shown) to outweigh benefits

County has no/limited existing capabilities and dependencies are likely to impede

Could negatively impact relationships with partners

Negatively impacts environment and/or climate change mitigation efforts

Inequitable

n/a

0

Does not align to a Strategic Objective

Evidence base is not well defined or measurable

Size of impact on one or more strategic outcomes is negligible or unclear

Net comparison is unclear

County has no/limited existing capabilities or dependencies are likely to impede

Does not involve collaboration with partners

Net neutral impact on environment and/or climate change mitigation efforts

Does not consider equity to a meaningful degree

n/a

1

Aligns to a Strategic Objective but not to a Strategic Initiative

Limited evidence-based research on outcomes; may have qualitative/theoretical support

Outcomes are defined but without target levels and/or expected impact is moderate

Moderate direct/indirect benefit relative to costs

County has existing capability to implement, or dependencies are unlikely to impede

Moderately expands County leverage through collaboration with partner(s)

Marginally positive impact on environment and/or climate change mitigation efforts

Considers equity to a meaningful degree, but not comprehensively

n/a

2

Aligns to a Strategic Objective and a Strategic Initiative

Outcomes are directly supported by evidence base or credible research supports anticipated outcomes

Outcomes are clearly defined and include target levels; expected impact on outcomes is high

Significant direct/indirect benefit relative to costs

County has existing capability to implement, and dependencies are unlikely to impede

Significantly expands County leverage through collaboration with partner(s)

Positively impacts environment and/or climate change mitigation efforts

Considers equity meaningfully and comprehensively

n/a

Score         (-1,0,1,2)

3

1

2

1

2

2

0

0

11

Rationale

Objective A

An upgraded infrastructure will ensure multiple County facilities are compliant and up to date with latest technology

Security infrastructures cut across different County locations to improve security and supports future technology integrations

Costs are outweighed by benefits of having safer environment for staff and residents and lower costs related to crime.

Security Infrastructure is already in place

Multiple County locations where security infrastructure is in place can communicate with Central locations

Environmental impact expected to stay the same due to camera, NVR and Switch installation

Does not address equity to a meaningful degree

n/a